|
|
|
GM
8.5" Axle Warning
By Scott Mueller. --
(written 1995/1996)
I
have discovered something that is very important for the Impala SS
(or for that matter any GM B-body or D-body) owner!! It pertains to
the rear axle, specifically proper lubrication of the outer rear
axle bearings.
If
you look at the rear differential cover, you will notice two small
indentations on either side directly in line with the axle tubes.
These indentations are to direct the flow of oil through two holes
in the differential case. The oil then flows down the axle tubes to
lubricate the axles and the outer axle bearings. Note that these
holes actually have two purposes, one is to be used by a case
spreader to spread the case during factory assembly (but this is not
required during service), but the second and more important function
of the holes is for additional lubricant to feed the outer axle
bearings, especially under severe service. In order to allow oil to
pass through these holes, the differential cover gasket is also
supposed to have two corresponding holes in it, which line up with
the holes in the case as well as the indentations to allow oil to
flow down the axle tubes.
Starting
in the 1990 model year, GM has been improperly installing
differential cover gaskets THAT DO NOT HAVE THE LUBRICATING HOLES!!!
If you do not change this gasket to one that has the proper holes,
your outer axle bearings, as well as the axles themselves, will be
destroyed by around 70K miles. The damaged (under lubricated)
bearings will wear grooves in the axle shafts, requiring that they
also be replaced. If this is left unchecked, the metal bits from the
damaged outer bearings and axles will also damage the inner
bearings, pinion bearings, as well as cause the spider gears to wear
into the differential carrier.
I
have a friend who has worked for a fairly large local municipality
servicing all of their fleet vehicles (80+ Caprice Police cars) for
the last several years. They observed that the correct gaskets with
the holes were used until about 1985. Then GM (or more accurately
Saginaw, now called American Axle) switched to silicone sealer
instead of a gasket. As long as the silicone did not fill up the
holes, there were no problems.
| Sometime
during 1990, GM went back to using a gasket, but
unfortunately it was one that did not incorporate the oil
holes. This is where the problems started. In the fleet my
friend works on, they started going through axle jobs left
and right. They keep excellent records and found that the
axles would trash at about 50,000 miles, which was 14,000
miles out of the warranty. What was noticed with every rear
end failure was bad axle shafts. The bearings wore
3/16" groove in the axle shaft. At the least just the
axles and bearings would be bad, however in many cases the
material removed from the axles and bearings had also ruined
the case, spider gears, ring and pinion, and all of the
other bearings. In some cases they literally had to replace
everything but the housing |
 |
They
then immediately started a new maintenance program on the rear axle
gasket and fluid changes. The first change was done at 15,000 miles
with the proper gasket. This allowed the axles to make it to about
80,000 miles before the same type of excessive wear occurred. Then
they altered the maintenance program further and went to a 3,000
mile gasket and oil change the first time, then every 15,000 miles
thereafter. Now their squad cars go 120,000 miles without any axle
problems. They don't have any data after that, as that is when the
cars normally are decommissioned.
In
case you are wondering, yes they have made GM aware of this problem,
but GM currently has done nothing about it, and even new '96
vehicles still come with the improper gaskets. To check this
further, I purchased a new factory replacement gasket over the
counter and it also lacks the lubricating holes!
I
was amazed to find this problem on my '94 Impala when changing the
rear axle fluid, and can tell that there was more wear than should
be present at 7K miles (the first factory recommended axle service
is 7.5K miles).
I
advise that anybody with a '90 or up GM B-chassis (Caprice, Impala,
or Roadmaster) or D-chassis (Fleetwood) undertake to IMMEDIATELY
replace the factory axle cover gasket with the Fel-Pro RDS 55028-1
gasket. If you do not, then you will very likely be performing major
service on the rear axle by 70K miles.
Again,
I must emphasize that this problem is still present on the '96
models as well.
We
were hypothesizing as to why GM does not do something about this
problem, and can only come up with the fact that all will seem fine
until the vehicle is well out of the warranty period. GM seems
unmotivated to correct the situation, as the local municipality has
communicated this problem to several of the Police and Fleet people
at GM. Now that these cars are going out of production, it is likely
this type of problem is not a high priority.
|
|
|